Trying to learn how to memorize classical conditioning concepts for your high school or college psychology class? This page is meant to be a resource to help you achieve that goal!
The idea of Pavlov’s dog pops up everywhere in pop culture. It appears in puns. If you ever had to study Brave New World in school, you might have heard references to Pavlov’s work come up in conversation. But can you explain the significance of Pavlov’s dogs?
In this video, we’re going to break down the work that Pavlov did with dogs and how his findings influenced a branch of psychology called Behaviorism. While behaviorism is not as popular today, it took the world by storm in the early 20th century and still has an impact on the history of psychology.
What is Classical Conditioning?
Classical Conditioning is a method of learning that happens when two stimuli are paired together. In many cases, a biological stimulus is usually paired with a neutral stimulus. For the example below, Ivan Pavlov trains dogs to associate the sound of a ringing bell with salivating.
Pavlov’s Dog Study
Behaviorists believe that learned behavior come from one of two processes: operant conditioning and classical conditioning. In this video, we will focus primarily on classical conditioning.
The idea of classical conditioning was first discovered through the work of Ivan Pavlov, a Russian psychologist. The participants in the study were dogs. Pavlov would ring a bell and then give the dog a treat. This process was repeated over and over again.
Things got interesting when the dogs started to “expect” the treat. At the sound of the bell, they would start salivating in anticipation of the treat. Now, the important thing to note here is that Pavlov was not trying to train the dogs to salivate. But this response came about through classical conditioning.
Different Parts of Classical Conditioning Studies
In order to understand classical conditioning, you will need to understand each component of Pavlov's dog study and how they influenced the dog’s response of salivation. Again, the researchers were not intending to teach the dogs to salivate on command. The salivation was an unconditioned response. The unconditioned response is a naturally occurring response.
The dogs began to salivate when they heard a bell. Before any studies began, the bell was a neutral stimulus. A neutral stimulus is any stimulus that has no associated response prior to training. It elicited no response from the dogs. It was only after the dogs were exposed to food after hearing a bell that the stimulus becomes a conditioned stimulus. The dogs were conditioned to salivate when they saw the bell, a previously neutral item with a neutral sound. A conditioned stimulus is any stimulus that has been associated with a response.
The food also plays a role - it’s the unconditioned stimulus. An unconditioned stimulus is any stimulus which still creates a response, but not the one we are manipulating. When you take food out of the equation and into another situation, it will still cause a reaction in the participants. Seeing the food will make the dogs salivate in any situation, whether or not any sort of “learning” has taken place.
There is another term that you should know relating to classical conditioning. It’s a conditioned response. The conditioned response is the response to the neutral stimulus that has been associated with the unconditioned stimulus. I’m going to use another example to show you how people or animals can develop conditioned responses to stimuli.
Let’s say you go to the doctor’s for a vaccine. Before the doctor gives you the painful shot, she touches you with a cotton ball to clean the area. When you get the vaccine, you feel pain and wince.
The next time you go to the doctor, they clean the area with a cotton ball. You jerk your arm away in an attempt to avoid the pain of the vaccine, even though the doctor did not give you the vaccine yet.
That response, jerking your arm away, is the conditioned response. It’s a way of avoiding an unconditioned stimuli (the vaccine) and the naturally-occuring unconditioned response (pain) caused by the vaccine.
John Watson’s perspective
At the same time that Pavlov was conducting his studies, Americans were also working to discover similar ideas. In fact, an American psychologist named Edwin Twitmyer conducted a similar study to Pavlov three years earlier than Pavlov. Instead of participants, Twitmyer used humans. He sounded a bell and shortly after would tap a part of the patient’s knee to test their reflexes. After some time, the sound of the bell would result in a “knee-jerk” reaction.
Twitmyer did not receive the credit for his work like Pavlov. But one American psychologist did make a big name for himself due to his work on classical conditioning and behaviorism as a whole. His name is John B. Watson.
Little Albert Study
Watson also conducted a study in behaviorism: the Little Albert Study.
This study is famous for being crucial to the behaviorist movement - but also because it’s very dark. Watson used a nine-month-old baby, who he nicknamed “Little Albert” or “Baby Albert” to see if fear was an innate trait or something that was learned. He surrounded Albert with various objects, including a white rat, a monkey, a Santa Claus mask, etc. Albert didn’t seem to be scared of the stimuli, even the white rat.
Here’s where things get uncomfortable. Watson exposed Albert to one of the stimuli. He then banged a steel bar and a hammer - right behind Albert’s head - when the baby would touch the stimulus. Obviously, that sound terrified Albert. He became fearful of the rat and other stimuli that he associated with the sound of the bar and the hammer. Whenever the stimuli would come near him, he would try to crawl away and start crying.
Let’s check in for a moment here. Do you remember the terms associated with classical conditioning?
The white rat is...now a conditioned stimulus. Formally, it was a neutral stimulus that did not provoke a response.
The steel bar and hammer are… unconditioned stimuli.
When Little Albert cried, he was displaying...an unconditioned response. His attempts to crawl away upon seeing the white rat after conditioning were...a conditioned response.
Behaviorism, while not very popular today, launched a treatment that is still used by today’s therapists. Mary Cover Jones is considered the Mother of Behavior Therapy after she attended a lecture by John B. Watson and attempted to undo the negative effects of classical conditioning.
She worked with a child who had fears of furry animals. By exposing the child to the animal (with no consequences,) as well as exposing the child to children who didn’t fear furry animals, she was able to relieve the child of his fears.
Can You Use Classical Conditioning On Yourself?
Classical conditioning does work on humans, but we often see cases of it when people are trying to “train” others. Jim offering Dwight mints every time he hears an email notification, for example, is an example of classical conditioning.
But can you condition yourself? Can you quit smoking, concentrate on your studies, or train yourself to save money by ringing bells?
Yes and no. It is possible to condition yourself to form certain habits, but you have to be patient and committed to the idea. There is more to learning than behaviorism, as we’ll discover in later videos.
Cognitive processes play a big role in how you choose to behave and how your brain processes information that it learns. But I’m not telling you that you can’t form (or break) a habit with classical conditioning. Give it a go! The more you are determined to form that habit, using classical conditioning or not, the more likely you will start to embody that habit.